Fundación Social del Empresariado Jalisciense
Ruben Dario 1313 4
Providencia
Guadalajara, Jalisco 44630
Mexico
Mission
To promote education, health and sustainable human development for vulnerable populations, and contribute to social equity in Jalisco
Most Meaningful Change
We work to improve the competitiveness of local enterprises by promoting a culture of wellness in the workplace, and helping their employees obtain the skills needed for a healthy lifestyle.
2008 Year Founded
10 Paid Staff (Full-Time Equivalent)
$68,600 Total Annual Grantmaking
Organization | Fundación Social del Empresariado Jalisciense |
---|
Address 1 | Ruben Dario 1313 4 |
---|
Address 2 | Providencia |
---|
City / Town | Guadalajara |
---|
State / Region | Jalisco |
---|
ZIP / Postal Code | 44630 |
---|
Country | Mexico |
---|
Continent | North America |
---|
Map Address (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Map City / Town (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Map State / Region (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Map Zip / Postal Code (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Map Country (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Phone | 333.100.2002 |
---|
Email | claus@fejal.org |
---|
Website | www.fejal.org |
---|
Organization Leader (Name, Title) | Presidente, Jose Luis Gonzalez Iñigo |
---|
Primary Contact’s Name | Claudia Marin |
---|
Primary Contact’s Position | Director |
---|
Year Founded | 2008 |
---|
Mission Statement | To promote education, health and sustainable human development for vulnerable populations, and contribute to social equity in Jalisco |
---|
Organization Description | Other |
---|
Other Description | Did not answer |
---|
Approximate Size of the Population Serviced | 58 |
---|
Total Paid Staff (Full-Time Equivalents) | 10 |
---|
Total Unpaid Staff (Full-Time Equivalents) | Did not answer |
---|
Total Board Members | 17 |
---|
Organization’s Total Income in Last Fiscal Year | $390,000 |
---|
Organization’s Gifts Income in Last Fiscal Year | Did not answer |
---|
Organization’s Total Expenditures in Last Fiscal Year | $354,000 |
---|
Organization’s Grantmaking Budget in Last Fiscal Year | $68,600 |
---|
Does Organization Have an Endowment | No but intend to build one |
---|
Value of Endowment (or Financial Reserves) as of the End of Last Fiscal Year | Did not answer |
---|
Change in Financial Status Over Last Three Years | Stayed about the same |
---|
Factors that Played a Role in the Origins of Your Organization |
---|
Community leadership | Played a centrally important role |
---|
Philanthropic gifts | No role |
---|
Grassroots activism | No role |
---|
Inadequate government services | Played an important role |
---|
Changes in the political environment | Played a slight role |
---|
Changes in the economic environment | Played an important role |
---|
Government initiative funding | Played a centrally important role |
---|
Foundation initiative funding | Played a centrally important role |
---|
Bilateral or multilateral initiative funding | Played a centrally important role |
---|
Favorable legal or fiscal policies | Played a centrally important role |
---|
|
Time Spent Working in Following Areas |
---|
Neighborhood | Lots of time |
---|
Locally | Lots of time |
---|
Regionally | Fair amount of time |
---|
Nationally | None |
---|
Internationally | None |
---|
|
Rate Importance of the Following Functions |
---|
Grantmaking | Slightly important |
---|
Having local people as leaders in the organization | Centrally important |
---|
Seeking local donations | Centrally important |
---|
Having a gender balance in the organization | Slightly important |
---|
Board reflective of community diversity | Centrally important |
---|
Building an endowment | Centrally important |
---|
Serving donor needs | Important but not central |
---|
Acting as a fiscal intermediary for the community | Slightly important |
---|
Building inclusion and trust in the community | Centrally important |
---|
Pursuing equity | Slightly important |
---|
Accountability to local people | Centrally important |
---|
Raising money for grantmaking annually | Important but not central |
---|
Community development | Centrally important |
---|
|
In the Last Year, Extent to Which Programming and/or Grantmaking Involved Work in the Following Areas |
---|
Arts and culture | Lot |
---|
Education | Little |
---|
Environment | Little |
---|
Health | Lot |
---|
Human and social services | Lot |
---|
Human rights | Fair amount |
---|
International relations | Little |
---|
Religion | Little |
---|
Economic development | Lot |
---|
Conflict resolution/bridging different parts of the community | Lot |
---|
Information technology | Little |
---|
Strengthening local or regional government | Fair amount |
---|
Housing | Not at all |
---|
Children | Lot |
---|
Water | Not at all |
---|
Alternative energy | Not at all |
---|
Disaster relief | Not at all |
---|
Advocacy with authorities | Lot |
---|
Job training | Fair amount |
---|
|
Nongrantmaking Services Offered to Community in Recent Years |
---|
Convening for issues of local concern | Often |
---|
Promote collaboration between grantees | Often |
---|
Promote understanding of public policy | Often |
---|
Training/capacity-building for local organizations | Often |
---|
Advocacy | Rarely |
---|
Loaned staff | Rarely |
---|
Research | Often |
---|
Community needs assessment | Often |
---|
Leadership development | Occasionally |
---|
Internships | Occasionally |
---|
Providing space for local organizations | Often |
---|
Access to information technology | Rarely |
---|
Publishing/knowledge sharing | Occasionally |
---|
|
Main Trends Over the Past Year in Geographic Area Served |
---|
Poverty | No change |
---|
Crime | Getting worse |
---|
Trust among different sections of the community | Getting worse |
---|
Equitable distribution of resources and services | No change |
---|
Social position of marginalized groups | No change |
---|
Responsiveness of authorities | Getting worse |
---|
Appropriateness of public policies | Getting better |
---|
Value of community assets | No change |
---|
Quality of the environment | Getting worse |
---|
Number of people and organizations working to change and improve their community | Getting better |
---|
Levels of innovation and risk taking in addressing community problems | No change |
---|
Networks and links between different parts of the community | No change |
---|
Gender equity | No change |
---|
Charitable giving through the community foundation | Getting better |
---|
Number of people and organizations involved in philanthropic giving | Getting worse |
---|
|
Extent to Which Organization Can Claim Tangible and Measurable Achievements in the Past Three Years |
---|
Poverty | Work in the sphere but no measurable achievement |
---|
Crime | Some important achievements |
---|
Trust among different sections of the community | Some important achievements |
---|
Equitable distribution of resources and services | A few small achievements |
---|
Social position of marginalized groups | A few small achievements |
---|
Responsiveness of authorities | A few small achievements |
---|
Appropriateness of public policies | A few small achievements |
---|
Value of community assets | A few small achievements |
---|
Quality of the environment | Much achievement |
---|
Number of people and organizations working to change and improve their community | Some important achievements |
---|
Levels of innovation and risk taking in addressing community problems | Much achievement |
---|
Networks and links between different parts of the community | A few small achievements |
---|
Gender equity | Much achievement |
---|
Charitable giving through the community foundation | A few small achievements |
---|
Number of people and organizations involved in philanthropic giving | Do not work in this sphere |
---|
|
Active Partnerships |
---|
Formal community associations and groups | Little |
---|
Informal associations of citizens | Not at all |
---|
Non-governmental organizations | Little |
---|
Local government | Little |
---|
National government | Not at all |
---|
Universities | Little |
---|
Schools | Little |
---|
Businesses | Little |
---|
|
Other Institutions Helpful to Our Work |
---|
National association of grantmakers | Very helpful |
---|
Regional association of grantmakers | Very helpful |
---|
Global Fund for Community Foundations | Very helpful |
---|
Particular foundation | Very helpful |
---|
Other organization | Very helpful |
---|
|
Involvement of Local People |
---|
Regularly survey local people about our programs | Yes |
---|
Local people are engaged in the delivery of our work | Yes |
---|
Local people control what our organization does | No |
---|
Have local people represented on our board | Yes |
---|
Have regular sessions where local people advise us what our programs should do | Yes |
---|
Actively engage local people as volunteers | Yes |
---|
All of our board is composed of local people | Yes |
---|
Account to local people about our successes and failures each year | Yes |
---|
|
Assistance in Overcoming Main Difficulties Faced in Developing Organization Further |
---|
Increased funding | Very important |
---|
Better legal or fiscal environment | Very important |
---|
More volunteers | Very important |
---|
Access to advice or technical assistance | Very important |
---|
Better local culture of giving | Very important |
---|
Stronger civil society | Very important |
---|
More responsive authorities | Very important |
---|
|
Other | Did not answer |
---|
Most Meaningful Change that Organization Has Helped to Bring About in the Last Three Years | We work to improve the competitiveness of local enterprises by promoting a culture of wellness in the workplace, and helping their employees obtain the skills needed for a healthy lifestyle. |
---|