Fonds de Dotation Bordeaux Solidaire
29 rue du Mirail
Bordeaux, Aquitaine 33000
France
Mission
Animation of governance; monitoring of funded projects and social impact; fundraising and communication
Most Meaningful Change
Our foundation is quite young to be able tell a story of meaninful change. Our greatest satisfaction is to involve local people, economic leaders and social leaders in the same endeavors. Our “Accorderie” project is growing, allowing people to live better together and to rent services through an exchange of time or money.
2012 Year Founded
1 Paid Staff (Full-Time Equivalent)
Organization | Fonds de Dotation Bordeaux Solidaire |
---|
Address 1 | 29 rue du Mirail |
---|
Address 2 | Did not answer |
---|
City / Town | Bordeaux |
---|
State / Region | Aquitaine |
---|
ZIP / Postal Code | 33000 |
---|
Country | France |
---|
Continent | Europe |
---|
Map Address (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Map City / Town (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Map State / Region (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Map Zip / Postal Code (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Map Country (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Phone | +33(5)56333796 |
---|
Email | contact@fondsbordeauxsolidaire.org |
---|
Website | www.fondsbordeauxsolidaire.org |
---|
Organization Leader (Name, Title) | Alain Juppe, President |
---|
Primary Contact’s Name | Stéphanie Ioan |
---|
Primary Contact’s Position | Delegate |
---|
Year Founded | 2012 |
---|
Mission Statement | Animation of governance; monitoring of funded projects and social impact; fundraising and communication |
---|
Organization Description | Community Foundation |
---|
Other Description | Did not answer |
---|
Approximate Size of the Population Serviced | 1,000 |
---|
Total Paid Staff (Full-Time Equivalents) | 1 |
---|
Total Unpaid Staff (Full-Time Equivalents) | 5 |
---|
Total Board Members | 30 |
---|
Organization’s Total Income in Last Fiscal Year | $132,000 |
---|
Organization’s Gifts Income in Last Fiscal Year | Did not answer |
---|
Organization’s Total Expenditures in Last Fiscal Year | $18,000 |
---|
Organization’s Grantmaking Budget in Last Fiscal Year | Did not answer |
---|
Does Organization Have an Endowment | No and do not intend to build one |
---|
Value of Endowment (or Financial Reserves) as of the End of Last Fiscal Year | Did not answer |
---|
Change in Financial Status Over Last Three Years | Significant improvement |
---|
Factors that Played a Role in the Origins of Your Organization |
---|
Community leadership | Played a centrally important role |
---|
Philanthropic gifts | Played an important role |
---|
Grassroots activism | Played a slight role |
---|
Inadequate government services | Played a slight role |
---|
Changes in the political environment | No role |
---|
Changes in the economic environment | No role |
---|
Government initiative funding | Played an important role |
---|
Foundation initiative funding | Played an important role |
---|
Bilateral or multilateral initiative funding | Played a centrally important role |
---|
Favorable legal or fiscal policies | Played an important role |
---|
|
Time Spent Working in Following Areas |
---|
Neighborhood | Fair amount of time |
---|
Locally | Lots of time |
---|
Regionally | Very little time |
---|
Nationally | None |
---|
Internationally | None |
---|
|
Rate Importance of the Following Functions |
---|
Grantmaking | Centrally important |
---|
Having local people as leaders in the organization | Centrally important |
---|
Seeking local donations | Centrally important |
---|
Having a gender balance in the organization | Important but not central |
---|
Board reflective of community diversity | Centrally important |
---|
Building an endowment | Not important |
---|
Serving donor needs | Did not answer |
---|
Acting as a fiscal intermediary for the community | Important but not central |
---|
Building inclusion and trust in the community | Centrally important |
---|
Pursuing equity | Centrally important |
---|
Accountability to local people | Important but not central |
---|
Raising money for grantmaking annually | Important but not central |
---|
Community development | Centrally important |
---|
|
In the Last Year, Extent to Which Programming and/or Grantmaking Involved Work in the Following Areas |
---|
Arts and culture | Little |
---|
Education | Little |
---|
Environment | Little |
---|
Health | Little |
---|
Human and social services | Lot |
---|
Human rights | Not at all |
---|
International relations | Not at all |
---|
Religion | Not at all |
---|
Economic development | Fair amount |
---|
Conflict resolution/bridging different parts of the community | Not at all |
---|
Information technology | Little |
---|
Strengthening local or regional government | Little |
---|
Housing | Little |
---|
Children | Little |
---|
Water | Not at all |
---|
Alternative energy | Not at all |
---|
Disaster relief | Not at all |
---|
Advocacy with authorities | Not at all |
---|
Job training | Fair amount |
---|
|
Nongrantmaking Services Offered to Community in Recent Years |
---|
Convening for issues of local concern | Occasionally |
---|
Promote collaboration between grantees | Often |
---|
Promote understanding of public policy | Rarely |
---|
Training/capacity-building for local organizations | Occasionally |
---|
Advocacy | Rarely |
---|
Loaned staff | Never |
---|
Research | Never |
---|
Community needs assessment | Rarely |
---|
Leadership development | Rarely |
---|
Internships | Rarely |
---|
Providing space for local organizations | Never |
---|
Access to information technology | Rarely |
---|
Publishing/knowledge sharing | Occasionally |
---|
|
Main Trends Over the Past Year in Geographic Area Served |
---|
Poverty | Getting better |
---|
Crime | No change |
---|
Trust among different sections of the community | No change |
---|
Equitable distribution of resources and services | No change |
---|
Social position of marginalized groups | Getting better |
---|
Responsiveness of authorities | No change |
---|
Appropriateness of public policies | No change |
---|
Value of community assets | Getting better |
---|
Quality of the environment | No change |
---|
Number of people and organizations working to change and improve their community | Getting better |
---|
Levels of innovation and risk taking in addressing community problems | Getting better |
---|
Networks and links between different parts of the community | No change |
---|
Gender equity | No change |
---|
Charitable giving through the community foundation | Getting better |
---|
Number of people and organizations involved in philanthropic giving | Getting better |
---|
|
Extent to Which Organization Can Claim Tangible and Measurable Achievements in the Past Three Years |
---|
Poverty | Work in the sphere but no measurable achievement |
---|
Crime | Do not work in this sphere |
---|
Trust among different sections of the community | Work in the sphere but no measurable achievement |
---|
Equitable distribution of resources and services | Work in the sphere but no measurable achievement |
---|
Social position of marginalized groups | A few small achievements |
---|
Responsiveness of authorities | Do not work in this sphere |
---|
Appropriateness of public policies | Do not work in this sphere |
---|
Value of community assets | Work in the sphere but no measurable achievement |
---|
Quality of the environment | Do not work in this sphere |
---|
Number of people and organizations working to change and improve their community | Work in the sphere but no measurable achievement |
---|
Levels of innovation and risk taking in addressing community problems | Work in the sphere but no measurable achievement |
---|
Networks and links between different parts of the community | A few small achievements |
---|
Gender equity | Work in the sphere but no measurable achievement |
---|
Charitable giving through the community foundation | Work in the sphere but no measurable achievement |
---|
Number of people and organizations involved in philanthropic giving | A few small achievements |
---|
|
Active Partnerships |
---|
Formal community associations and groups | Little |
---|
Informal associations of citizens | Not at all |
---|
Non-governmental organizations | Not at all |
---|
Local government | Little |
---|
National government | N/A |
---|
Universities | Not at all |
---|
Schools | N/A |
---|
Businesses | Little |
---|
|
Other Institutions Helpful to Our Work |
---|
National association of grantmakers | N/A |
---|
Regional association of grantmakers | N/A |
---|
Global Fund for Community Foundations | N/A |
---|
Particular foundation | Helpful |
---|
Other organization | Helpful |
---|
|
Involvement of Local People |
---|
Regularly survey local people about our programs | Yes |
---|
Local people are engaged in the delivery of our work | Yes |
---|
Local people control what our organization does | No |
---|
Have local people represented on our board | Yes |
---|
Have regular sessions where local people advise us what our programs should do | No |
---|
Actively engage local people as volunteers | Yes |
---|
All of our board is composed of local people | No |
---|
Account to local people about our successes and failures each year | Yes |
---|
|
Assistance in Overcoming Main Difficulties Faced in Developing Organization Further |
---|
Increased funding | Very important |
---|
Better legal or fiscal environment | Neither important nor unimportant |
---|
More volunteers | Important |
---|
Access to advice or technical assistance | Important |
---|
Better local culture of giving | Very important |
---|
Stronger civil society | Important |
---|
More responsive authorities | Neither important nor unimportant |
---|
|
Other | Did not answer |
---|
Most Meaningful Change that Organization Has Helped to Bring About in the Last Three Years | Our foundation is quite young to be able tell a story of meaninful change. Our greatest satisfaction is to involve local people, economic leaders and social leaders in the same endeavors. Our “Accorderie” project is growing, allowing people to live better together and to rent services through an exchange of time or money. |
---|