CpF-Centrum pre filantropiu
Kozia 11
Bratislava, 811 03
Slovakia
Mission
To promote philanthropy and civil society
Most Meaningful Change
We created an online giving portal where people can help each other. We also helped other NGOs by establishing a website-based system that enables them to receive online donations and communicate with their donors.
2002 Year Founded
15 Paid Staff (Full-Time Equivalent)
$90,000 Total Annual Grantmaking
Organization | CpF-Centrum pre filantropiu |
---|
Address 1 | Kozia 11 |
---|
Address 2 | |
---|
City / Town | Bratislava |
---|
State / Region | Did not answer |
---|
ZIP / Postal Code | 811 03 |
---|
Country | Slovakia |
---|
Continent | Europe |
---|
Map Address (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Map City / Town (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Map State / Region (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Map Zip / Postal Code (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Map Country (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Phone | 421 2 5464 4682 |
---|
Email | cpf@changenet.sk |
---|
Website | www.cpf.sk |
---|
Organization Leader (Name, Title) | Boris Strečanský, Executive Director |
---|
Primary Contact’s Name | Boris Strecansky |
---|
Primary Contact’s Position | Executive Director |
---|
Year Founded | 2002 |
---|
Mission Statement | To promote philanthropy and civil society |
---|
Organization Description | Did not Answer |
---|
Other Description | Donor Service and Philanthropy Infrastructure Organization |
---|
Approximate Size of the Population Serviced | 5,500,000 |
---|
Total Paid Staff (Full-Time Equivalents) | 15 |
---|
Total Unpaid Staff (Full-Time Equivalents) | 5 |
---|
Total Board Members | 4 |
---|
Organization’s Total Income in Last Fiscal Year | $720,000 |
---|
Organization’s Gifts Income in Last Fiscal Year | Did not answer |
---|
Organization’s Total Expenditures in Last Fiscal Year | $740,000 |
---|
Organization’s Grantmaking Budget in Last Fiscal Year | $90,000 |
---|
Does Organization Have an Endowment | No and do not intend to build one |
---|
Value of Endowment (or Financial Reserves) as of the End of Last Fiscal Year | Did not answer |
---|
Change in Financial Status Over Last Three Years | Declined |
---|
Factors that Played a Role in the Origins of Your Organization |
---|
Community leadership | Played an important role |
---|
Philanthropic gifts | Played a slight role |
---|
Grassroots activism | Played a centrally important role |
---|
Inadequate government services | Played a slight role |
---|
Changes in the political environment | Played a slight role |
---|
Changes in the economic environment | Played a slight role |
---|
Government initiative funding | No role |
---|
Foundation initiative funding | Played a slight role |
---|
Bilateral or multilateral initiative funding | Played a slight role |
---|
Favorable legal or fiscal policies | Played a centrally important role |
---|
|
Time Spent Working in Following Areas |
---|
Neighborhood | None |
---|
Locally | Very little time |
---|
Regionally | Fair amount of time |
---|
Nationally | Lots of time |
---|
Internationally | Very little time |
---|
|
Rate Importance of the Following Functions |
---|
Grantmaking | Important but not central |
---|
Having local people as leaders in the organization | Important but not central |
---|
Seeking local donations | Slightly important |
---|
Having a gender balance in the organization | Slightly important |
---|
Board reflective of community diversity | Slightly important |
---|
Building an endowment | Not important |
---|
Serving donor needs | Centrally important |
---|
Acting as a fiscal intermediary for the community | Important but not central |
---|
Building inclusion and trust in the community | Slightly important |
---|
Pursuing equity | Slightly important |
---|
Accountability to local people | Slightly important |
---|
Raising money for grantmaking annually | Slightly important |
---|
Community development | Important but not central |
---|
|
In the Last Year, Extent to Which Programming and/or Grantmaking Involved Work in the Following Areas |
---|
Arts and culture | Little |
---|
Education | Fair amount |
---|
Environment | Little |
---|
Health | Lot |
---|
Human and social services | Lot |
---|
Human rights | Fair amount |
---|
International relations | Not at all |
---|
Religion | Not at all |
---|
Economic development | Little |
---|
Conflict resolution/bridging different parts of the community | Not at all |
---|
Information technology | Fair amount |
---|
Strengthening local or regional government | Not at all |
---|
Housing | Little |
---|
Children | Fair amount |
---|
Water | Not at all |
---|
Alternative energy | Little |
---|
Disaster relief | Not at all |
---|
Advocacy with authorities | Fair amount |
---|
Job training | Little |
---|
|
Nongrantmaking Services Offered to Community in Recent Years |
---|
Convening for issues of local concern | Occasionally |
---|
Promote collaboration between grantees | Occasionally |
---|
Promote understanding of public policy | Rarely |
---|
Training/capacity-building for local organizations | Occasionally |
---|
Advocacy | Often |
---|
Loaned staff | Never |
---|
Research | Occasionally |
---|
Community needs assessment | Rarely |
---|
Leadership development | Rarely |
---|
Internships | Occasionally |
---|
Providing space for local organizations | Occasionally |
---|
Access to information technology | Often |
---|
Publishing/knowledge sharing | Occasionally |
---|
|
Main Trends Over the Past Year in Geographic Area Served |
---|
Poverty | No change |
---|
Crime | No change |
---|
Trust among different sections of the community | Getting worse |
---|
Equitable distribution of resources and services | Getting worse |
---|
Social position of marginalized groups | Getting worse |
---|
Responsiveness of authorities | No change |
---|
Appropriateness of public policies | No change |
---|
Value of community assets | Getting worse |
---|
Quality of the environment | Getting better |
---|
Number of people and organizations working to change and improve their community | No change |
---|
Levels of innovation and risk taking in addressing community problems | Getting worse |
---|
Networks and links between different parts of the community | No change |
---|
Gender equity | Getting better |
---|
Charitable giving through the community foundation | No change |
---|
Number of people and organizations involved in philanthropic giving | Getting better |
---|
|
Extent to Which Organization Can Claim Tangible and Measurable Achievements in the Past Three Years |
---|
Poverty | Work in the sphere but no measurable achievement |
---|
Crime | Do not work in this sphere |
---|
Trust among different sections of the community | Do not work in this sphere |
---|
Equitable distribution of resources and services | Do not work in this sphere |
---|
Social position of marginalized groups | Work in the sphere but no measurable achievement |
---|
Responsiveness of authorities | A few small achievements |
---|
Appropriateness of public policies | A few small achievements |
---|
Value of community assets | Do not work in this sphere |
---|
Quality of the environment | Do not work in this sphere |
---|
Number of people and organizations working to change and improve their community | A few small achievements |
---|
Levels of innovation and risk taking in addressing community problems | A few small achievements |
---|
Networks and links between different parts of the community | A few small achievements |
---|
Gender equity | Work in the sphere but no measurable achievement |
---|
Charitable giving through the community foundation | Work in the sphere but no measurable achievement |
---|
Number of people and organizations involved in philanthropic giving | A few small achievements |
---|
|
Active Partnerships |
---|
Formal community associations and groups | Not at all |
---|
Informal associations of citizens | Not at all |
---|
Non-governmental organizations | Little |
---|
Local government | N/A |
---|
National government | Not at all |
---|
Universities | N/A |
---|
Schools | N/A |
---|
Businesses | Little |
---|
|
Other Institutions Helpful to Our Work |
---|
National association of grantmakers | Helpful |
---|
Regional association of grantmakers | Neither helpful or unhelpful |
---|
Global Fund for Community Foundations | Neither helpful or unhelpful |
---|
Particular foundation | Helpful |
---|
Other organization | N/A |
---|
|
Involvement of Local People |
---|
Regularly survey local people about our programs | No |
---|
Local people are engaged in the delivery of our work | Yes |
---|
Local people control what our organization does | Yes |
---|
Have local people represented on our board | Yes |
---|
Have regular sessions where local people advise us what our programs should do | Yes |
---|
Actively engage local people as volunteers | Yes |
---|
All of our board is composed of local people | Yes |
---|
Account to local people about our successes and failures each year | Yes |
---|
|
Assistance in Overcoming Main Difficulties Faced in Developing Organization Further |
---|
Increased funding | Important |
---|
Better legal or fiscal environment | Important |
---|
More volunteers | Important |
---|
Access to advice or technical assistance | Neither important nor unimportant |
---|
Better local culture of giving | Neither important nor unimportant |
---|
Stronger civil society | Important |
---|
More responsive authorities | Important |
---|
|
Other | renewed internal leadership |
---|
Most Meaningful Change that Organization Has Helped to Bring About in the Last Three Years | We created an online giving portal where people can help each other. We also helped other NGOs by establishing a website-based system that enables them to receive online donations and communicate with their donors. |
---|