Portland Foundation
112 East Main Street
Portland, Indiana 47371
United States
Mission
To enhance the quality of life for the people of Jay County, Indiana, now and for generations to come, by building community endowment, effecting significant impact through grantmaking, and providing leadership on key community issues
1951 Year Founded
2 Paid Staff (Full-Time Equivalent)
$23,755,000 Endowment Value
$500,000 Total Annual Grantmaking
Organization | Portland Foundation |
---|
Address 1 | 112 East Main Street |
---|
Address 2 | Did not answer |
---|
City / Town | Portland |
---|
State / Region | Indiana |
---|
ZIP / Postal Code | 47371 |
---|
Country | United States |
---|
Continent | North America |
---|
Map Address (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Map City / Town (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Map State / Region (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Map Zip / Postal Code (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Map Country (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Phone | 260-726-4260 |
---|
Email | tpf@portlandfoundation.org |
---|
Website | www.portlandfoundation.org |
---|
Organization Leader (Name, Title) | Douglas Inman, Executive Director |
---|
Primary Contact’s Name | Douglas Inman |
---|
Primary Contact’s Position | Executive Director |
---|
Year Founded | 1951 |
---|
Mission Statement | To enhance the quality of life for the people of Jay County, Indiana, now and for generations to come, by building community endowment, effecting significant impact through grantmaking, and providing leadership on key community issues |
---|
Organization Description | Community Foundation |
---|
Other Description | Did not answer |
---|
Approximate Size of the Population Serviced | 21,000 |
---|
Total Paid Staff (Full-Time Equivalents) | 2 |
---|
Total Unpaid Staff (Full-Time Equivalents) | Did not answer |
---|
Total Board Members | 9 |
---|
Organization’s Total Income in Last Fiscal Year | $4,541,915 |
---|
Organization’s Gifts Income in Last Fiscal Year | $4,016,811 |
---|
Organization’s Total Expenditures in Last Fiscal Year | $851,409 |
---|
Organization’s Grantmaking Budget in Last Fiscal Year | $500,000 |
---|
Does Organization Have an Endowment | Yes |
---|
Value of Endowment (or Financial Reserves) as of the End of Last Fiscal Year | $23,755,000 |
---|
Change in Financial Status Over Last Three Years | Significant improvement |
---|
Factors that Played a Role in the Origins of Your Organization |
---|
Community leadership | Played a centrally important role |
---|
Philanthropic gifts | Played a slight role |
---|
Grassroots activism | Played a centrally important role |
---|
Inadequate government services | No role |
---|
Changes in the political environment | No role |
---|
Changes in the economic environment | No role |
---|
Government initiative funding | No role |
---|
Foundation initiative funding | No role |
---|
Bilateral or multilateral initiative funding | No role |
---|
Favorable legal or fiscal policies | No role |
---|
|
Time Spent Working in Following Areas |
---|
Neighborhood | None |
---|
Locally | Lots of time |
---|
Regionally | None |
---|
Nationally | None |
---|
Internationally | None |
---|
|
Rate Importance of the Following Functions |
---|
Grantmaking | Centrally important |
---|
Having local people as leaders in the organization | Not important |
---|
Seeking local donations | Centrally important |
---|
Having a gender balance in the organization | Not important |
---|
Board reflective of community diversity | Important but not central |
---|
Building an endowment | Centrally important |
---|
Serving donor needs | Centrally important |
---|
Acting as a fiscal intermediary for the community | Slightly important |
---|
Building inclusion and trust in the community | Important but not central |
---|
Pursuing equity | Not important |
---|
Accountability to local people | Centrally important |
---|
Raising money for grantmaking annually | Slightly important |
---|
Community development | Important but not central |
---|
|
In the Last Year, Extent to Which Programming and/or Grantmaking Involved Work in the Following Areas |
---|
Arts and culture | Fair amount |
---|
Education | Fair amount |
---|
Environment | Little |
---|
Health | Fair amount |
---|
Human and social services | Fair amount |
---|
Human rights | Not at all |
---|
International relations | Not at all |
---|
Religion | Not at all |
---|
Economic development | Little |
---|
Conflict resolution/bridging different parts of the community | Not at all |
---|
Information technology | Not at all |
---|
Strengthening local or regional government | Not at all |
---|
Housing | Not at all |
---|
Children | Fair amount |
---|
Water | Not at all |
---|
Alternative energy | Not at all |
---|
Disaster relief | Not at all |
---|
Advocacy with authorities | Not at all |
---|
Job training | Not at all |
---|
|
Nongrantmaking Services Offered to Community in Recent Years |
---|
Convening for issues of local concern | Occasionally |
---|
Promote collaboration between grantees | Occasionally |
---|
Promote understanding of public policy | Rarely |
---|
Training/capacity-building for local organizations | Rarely |
---|
Advocacy | Never |
---|
Loaned staff | Never |
---|
Research | Never |
---|
Community needs assessment | Often |
---|
Leadership development | Rarely |
---|
Internships | Rarely |
---|
Providing space for local organizations | Rarely |
---|
Access to information technology | Never |
---|
Publishing/knowledge sharing | Never |
---|
|
Main Trends Over the Past Year in Geographic Area Served |
---|
Poverty | Getting worse |
---|
Crime | No change |
---|
Trust among different sections of the community | No change |
---|
Equitable distribution of resources and services | No change |
---|
Social position of marginalized groups | No change |
---|
Responsiveness of authorities | No change |
---|
Appropriateness of public policies | No change |
---|
Value of community assets | Getting better |
---|
Quality of the environment | No change |
---|
Number of people and organizations working to change and improve their community | Getting better |
---|
Levels of innovation and risk taking in addressing community problems | No change |
---|
Networks and links between different parts of the community | No change |
---|
Gender equity | No change |
---|
Charitable giving through the community foundation | Getting much better |
---|
Number of people and organizations involved in philanthropic giving | Getting better |
---|
|
Extent to Which Organization Can Claim Tangible and Measurable Achievements in the Past Three Years |
---|
Poverty | Do not work in this sphere |
---|
Crime | Do not work in this sphere |
---|
Trust among different sections of the community | Do not work in this sphere |
---|
Equitable distribution of resources and services | Do not work in this sphere |
---|
Social position of marginalized groups | Do not work in this sphere |
---|
Responsiveness of authorities | Do not work in this sphere |
---|
Appropriateness of public policies | Do not work in this sphere |
---|
Value of community assets | A few small achievements |
---|
Quality of the environment | Do not work in this sphere |
---|
Number of people and organizations working to change and improve their community | A few small achievements |
---|
Levels of innovation and risk taking in addressing community problems | Do not work in this sphere |
---|
Networks and links between different parts of the community | Do not work in this sphere |
---|
Gender equity | Do not work in this sphere |
---|
Charitable giving through the community foundation | Much achievement |
---|
Number of people and organizations involved in philanthropic giving | Some important achievements |
---|
|
Active Partnerships |
---|
Formal community associations and groups | Little |
---|
Informal associations of citizens | Little |
---|
Non-governmental organizations | Little |
---|
Local government | Little |
---|
National government | Not at all |
---|
Universities | Not at all |
---|
Schools | Little |
---|
Businesses | Little |
---|
|
Other Institutions Helpful to Our Work |
---|
National association of grantmakers | Neither helpful or unhelpful |
---|
Regional association of grantmakers | Helpful |
---|
Global Fund for Community Foundations | N/A |
---|
Particular foundation | Very helpful |
---|
Other organization | N/A |
---|
|
Involvement of Local People |
---|
Regularly survey local people about our programs | No |
---|
Local people are engaged in the delivery of our work | No |
---|
Local people control what our organization does | No |
---|
Have local people represented on our board | Yes |
---|
Have regular sessions where local people advise us what our programs should do | No |
---|
Actively engage local people as volunteers | No |
---|
All of our board is composed of local people | Yes |
---|
Account to local people about our successes and failures each year | Yes |
---|
|
Assistance in Overcoming Main Difficulties Faced in Developing Organization Further |
---|
Increased funding | Important |
---|
Better legal or fiscal environment | Neither important nor unimportant |
---|
More volunteers | Neither important nor unimportant |
---|
Access to advice or technical assistance | Neither important nor unimportant |
---|
Better local culture of giving | Important |
---|
Stronger civil society | Neither important nor unimportant |
---|
More responsive authorities | Neither important nor unimportant |
---|
|
Other | Did not answer |
---|
Most Meaningful Change that Organization Has Helped to Bring About in the Last Three Years | Did not answer |
---|