Bexley Community Foundation
552 South Drexel Avenue
Bexley, Ohio 43209
United States
Mission
To sustain and enhance Bexley as a special place to live, learn, work and play
2010 Year Founded
1 Paid Staff (Full-Time Equivalent)
$451,593 Endowment Value
$150,000 Total Annual Grantmaking
Organization | Bexley Community Foundation |
---|
Address 1 | 552 South Drexel Avenue |
---|
Address 2 | Did not answer |
---|
City / Town | Bexley |
---|
State / Region | Ohio |
---|
ZIP / Postal Code | 43209 |
---|
Country | United States |
---|
Continent | North America |
---|
Map Address (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Map City / Town (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Map State / Region (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Map Zip / Postal Code (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Map Country (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Phone | 614-235-4070 |
---|
Email | wabraham@bexleycommunityfoundation.org |
---|
Website | www.bexleycommunityfoundation.org |
---|
Organization Leader (Name, Title) | Whitney Abraham, Executive Director |
---|
Primary Contact’s Name | Whitney Abraham |
---|
Primary Contact’s Position | Executive Director |
---|
Year Founded | 2010 |
---|
Mission Statement | To sustain and enhance Bexley as a special place to live, learn, work and play |
---|
Organization Description | Community Foundation |
---|
Other Description | Did not answer |
---|
Approximate Size of the Population Serviced | 14,000 |
---|
Total Paid Staff (Full-Time Equivalents) | 1 |
---|
Total Unpaid Staff (Full-Time Equivalents) | Did not answer |
---|
Total Board Members | 16 |
---|
Organization’s Total Income in Last Fiscal Year | $343,437 |
---|
Organization’s Gifts Income in Last Fiscal Year | Did not answer |
---|
Organization’s Total Expenditures in Last Fiscal Year | $169,097 |
---|
Organization’s Grantmaking Budget in Last Fiscal Year | $150,000 |
---|
Does Organization Have an Endowment | Yes |
---|
Value of Endowment (or Financial Reserves) as of the End of Last Fiscal Year | $451,593 |
---|
Change in Financial Status Over Last Three Years | A little improvement |
---|
Factors that Played a Role in the Origins of Your Organization |
---|
Community leadership | Played an important role |
---|
Philanthropic gifts | Played a centrally important role |
---|
Grassroots activism | Played an important role |
---|
Inadequate government services | Played an important role |
---|
Changes in the political environment | Played a slight role |
---|
Changes in the economic environment | Played a slight role |
---|
Government initiative funding | Played a slight role |
---|
Foundation initiative funding | Played a centrally important role |
---|
Bilateral or multilateral initiative funding | Played a slight role |
---|
Favorable legal or fiscal policies | No role |
---|
|
Time Spent Working in Following Areas |
---|
Neighborhood | Lots of time |
---|
Locally | Lots of time |
---|
Regionally | Fair amount of time |
---|
Nationally | None |
---|
Internationally | None |
---|
|
Rate Importance of the Following Functions |
---|
Grantmaking | Centrally important |
---|
Having local people as leaders in the organization | Centrally important |
---|
Seeking local donations | Centrally important |
---|
Having a gender balance in the organization | Not important |
---|
Board reflective of community diversity | Slightly important |
---|
Building an endowment | Centrally important |
---|
Serving donor needs | Centrally important |
---|
Acting as a fiscal intermediary for the community | Centrally important |
---|
Building inclusion and trust in the community | Important but not central |
---|
Pursuing equity | Slightly important |
---|
Accountability to local people | Centrally important |
---|
Raising money for grantmaking annually | Centrally important |
---|
Community development | Centrally important |
---|
|
In the Last Year, Extent to Which Programming and/or Grantmaking Involved Work in the Following Areas |
---|
Arts and culture | Little |
---|
Education | Fair amount |
---|
Environment | Little |
---|
Health | Not at all |
---|
Human and social services | Fair amount |
---|
Human rights | Not at all |
---|
International relations | Not at all |
---|
Religion | Little |
---|
Economic development | Fair amount |
---|
Conflict resolution/bridging different parts of the community | Little |
---|
Information technology | Fair amount |
---|
Strengthening local or regional government | Not at all |
---|
Housing | Not at all |
---|
Children | Fair amount |
---|
Water | Not at all |
---|
Alternative energy | Little |
---|
Disaster relief | Not at all |
---|
Advocacy with authorities | Not at all |
---|
Job training | Not at all |
---|
|
Nongrantmaking Services Offered to Community in Recent Years |
---|
Convening for issues of local concern | Occasionally |
---|
Promote collaboration between grantees | Often |
---|
Promote understanding of public policy | Occasionally |
---|
Training/capacity-building for local organizations | Rarely |
---|
Advocacy | Occasionally |
---|
Loaned staff | Rarely |
---|
Research | Rarely |
---|
Community needs assessment | Occasionally |
---|
Leadership development | Occasionally |
---|
Internships | Rarely |
---|
Providing space for local organizations | Occasionally |
---|
Access to information technology | Occasionally |
---|
Publishing/knowledge sharing | Occasionally |
---|
|
Main Trends Over the Past Year in Geographic Area Served |
---|
Poverty | No change |
---|
Crime | No change |
---|
Trust among different sections of the community | Getting better |
---|
Equitable distribution of resources and services | Getting better |
---|
Social position of marginalized groups | Getting better |
---|
Responsiveness of authorities | No change |
---|
Appropriateness of public policies | No change |
---|
Value of community assets | Getting much better |
---|
Quality of the environment | No change |
---|
Number of people and organizations working to change and improve their community | Getting better |
---|
Levels of innovation and risk taking in addressing community problems | Getting better |
---|
Networks and links between different parts of the community | Getting better |
---|
Gender equity | No change |
---|
Charitable giving through the community foundation | Getting much better |
---|
Number of people and organizations involved in philanthropic giving | Getting much better |
---|
|
Extent to Which Organization Can Claim Tangible and Measurable Achievements in the Past Three Years |
---|
Poverty | Do not work in this sphere |
---|
Crime | Do not work in this sphere |
---|
Trust among different sections of the community | Work in the sphere but no measurable achievement |
---|
Equitable distribution of resources and services | Work in the sphere but no measurable achievement |
---|
Social position of marginalized groups | Work in the sphere but no measurable achievement |
---|
Responsiveness of authorities | Do not work in this sphere |
---|
Appropriateness of public policies | Do not work in this sphere |
---|
Value of community assets | A few small achievements |
---|
Quality of the environment | Work in the sphere but no measurable achievement |
---|
Number of people and organizations working to change and improve their community | A few small achievements |
---|
Levels of innovation and risk taking in addressing community problems | A few small achievements |
---|
Networks and links between different parts of the community | Some important achievements |
---|
Gender equity | Do not work in this sphere |
---|
Charitable giving through the community foundation | Much achievement |
---|
Number of people and organizations involved in philanthropic giving | Much achievement |
---|
|
Active Partnerships |
---|
Formal community associations and groups | Lot |
---|
Informal associations of citizens | Lot |
---|
Non-governmental organizations | Lot |
---|
Local government | Lot |
---|
National government | Not at all |
---|
Universities | Lot |
---|
Schools | Lot |
---|
Businesses | Little |
---|
|
Other Institutions Helpful to Our Work |
---|
National association of grantmakers | Neither helpful or unhelpful |
---|
Regional association of grantmakers | Neither helpful or unhelpful |
---|
Global Fund for Community Foundations | Neither helpful or unhelpful |
---|
Particular foundation | Helpful |
---|
Other organization | Helpful |
---|
|
Involvement of Local People |
---|
Regularly survey local people about our programs | Yes |
---|
Local people are engaged in the delivery of our work | No |
---|
Local people control what our organization does | No |
---|
Have local people represented on our board | Yes |
---|
Have regular sessions where local people advise us what our programs should do | No |
---|
Actively engage local people as volunteers | Yes |
---|
All of our board is composed of local people | Yes |
---|
Account to local people about our successes and failures each year | Yes |
---|
|
Assistance in Overcoming Main Difficulties Faced in Developing Organization Further |
---|
Increased funding | Important |
---|
Better legal or fiscal environment | Unimportant |
---|
More volunteers | Important |
---|
Access to advice or technical assistance | Neither important nor unimportant |
---|
Better local culture of giving | Important |
---|
Stronger civil society | Important |
---|
More responsive authorities | Unimportant |
---|
|
Other | Did not answer |
---|
Most Meaningful Change that Organization Has Helped to Bring About in the Last Three Years | Did not answer |
---|