Park City Community Foundation
Post Office Box 681499
Park City, Utah 84068
United States
Mission
To strengthen and unite us by identifying needs, giving, supporting and connecting our community
Most Meaningful Change
We have increased the awareness of how nonprofit organizations enhance our lives every day and have encouraged more citizens to support them.
2007 Year Founded
5 Paid Staff (Full-Time Equivalent)
$300,000 Endowment Value
$1,000,000 Total Annual Grantmaking
Organization | Park City Community Foundation |
---|
Address 1 | Post Office Box 681499 |
---|
Address 2 | Did not answer |
---|
City / Town | Park City |
---|
State / Region | Utah |
---|
ZIP / Postal Code | 84068 |
---|
Country | United States |
---|
Continent | North America |
---|
Map Address (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Map City / Town (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Map State / Region (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Map Zip / Postal Code (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Map Country (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Phone | 435-214.7477 |
---|
Email | Peregrine@theparkcityfoundation.org |
---|
Website | www.parkcitycommunityfoundation.org |
---|
Organization Leader (Name, Title) | Katie Wright, Executive Director |
---|
Primary Contact’s Name | Peregrine Bosler |
---|
Primary Contact’s Position | Development Manager |
---|
Year Founded | 2007 |
---|
Mission Statement | To strengthen and unite us by identifying needs, giving, supporting and connecting our community |
---|
Organization Description | Community Foundation |
---|
Other Description | Did not answer |
---|
Approximate Size of the Population Serviced | 40,000 |
---|
Total Paid Staff (Full-Time Equivalents) | 5 |
---|
Total Unpaid Staff (Full-Time Equivalents) | Did not answer |
---|
Total Board Members | 24 |
---|
Organization’s Total Income in Last Fiscal Year | $1,000,000 |
---|
Organization’s Gifts Income in Last Fiscal Year | $934,363 |
---|
Organization’s Total Expenditures in Last Fiscal Year | $500,000 |
---|
Organization’s Grantmaking Budget in Last Fiscal Year | $1,000,000 |
---|
Does Organization Have an Endowment | Yes |
---|
Value of Endowment (or Financial Reserves) as of the End of Last Fiscal Year | $300,000 |
---|
Change in Financial Status Over Last Three Years | Stayed about the same |
---|
Factors that Played a Role in the Origins of Your Organization |
---|
Community leadership | Played a centrally important role |
---|
Philanthropic gifts | Played a centrally important role |
---|
Grassroots activism | Played a slight role |
---|
Inadequate government services | Played a slight role |
---|
Changes in the political environment | Played a slight role |
---|
Changes in the economic environment | Played an important role |
---|
Government initiative funding | Played a slight role |
---|
Foundation initiative funding | Played a centrally important role |
---|
Bilateral or multilateral initiative funding | Played a centrally important role |
---|
Favorable legal or fiscal policies | Played a centrally important role |
---|
|
Time Spent Working in Following Areas |
---|
Neighborhood | Fair amount of time |
---|
Locally | Lots of time |
---|
Regionally | None |
---|
Nationally | Very little time |
---|
Internationally | None |
---|
|
Rate Importance of the Following Functions |
---|
Grantmaking | Centrally important |
---|
Having local people as leaders in the organization | Centrally important |
---|
Seeking local donations | Centrally important |
---|
Having a gender balance in the organization | Centrally important |
---|
Board reflective of community diversity | Centrally important |
---|
Building an endowment | Centrally important |
---|
Serving donor needs | Centrally important |
---|
Acting as a fiscal intermediary for the community | Centrally important |
---|
Building inclusion and trust in the community | Centrally important |
---|
Pursuing equity | Important but not central |
---|
Accountability to local people | Centrally important |
---|
Raising money for grantmaking annually | Centrally important |
---|
Community development | Centrally important |
---|
|
In the Last Year, Extent to Which Programming and/or Grantmaking Involved Work in the Following Areas |
---|
Arts and culture | Fair amount |
---|
Education | Lot |
---|
Environment | Fair amount |
---|
Health | Lot |
---|
Human and social services | Lot |
---|
Human rights | Fair amount |
---|
International relations | Not at all |
---|
Religion | Not at all |
---|
Economic development | Little |
---|
Conflict resolution/bridging different parts of the community | Not at all |
---|
Information technology | Lot |
---|
Strengthening local or regional government | Little |
---|
Housing | Fair amount |
---|
Children | Lot |
---|
Water | Fair amount |
---|
Alternative energy | Fair amount |
---|
Disaster relief | Not at all |
---|
Advocacy with authorities | Fair amount |
---|
Job training | Little |
---|
|
Nongrantmaking Services Offered to Community in Recent Years |
---|
Convening for issues of local concern | Often |
---|
Promote collaboration between grantees | Often |
---|
Promote understanding of public policy | Occasionally |
---|
Training/capacity-building for local organizations | Often |
---|
Advocacy | Occasionally |
---|
Loaned staff | Never |
---|
Research | Occasionally |
---|
Community needs assessment | Occasionally |
---|
Leadership development | Often |
---|
Internships | Occasionally |
---|
Providing space for local organizations | Rarely |
---|
Access to information technology | Occasionally |
---|
Publishing/knowledge sharing | Often |
---|
|
Main Trends Over the Past Year in Geographic Area Served |
---|
Poverty | No change |
---|
Crime | Getting worse |
---|
Trust among different sections of the community | No change |
---|
Equitable distribution of resources and services | Getting better |
---|
Social position of marginalized groups | Getting better |
---|
Responsiveness of authorities | No change |
---|
Appropriateness of public policies | No change |
---|
Value of community assets | Getting better |
---|
Quality of the environment | Getting better |
---|
Number of people and organizations working to change and improve their community | Getting better |
---|
Levels of innovation and risk taking in addressing community problems | Getting better |
---|
Networks and links between different parts of the community | Getting better |
---|
Gender equity | No change |
---|
Charitable giving through the community foundation | Getting much better |
---|
Number of people and organizations involved in philanthropic giving | Getting much better |
---|
|
Extent to Which Organization Can Claim Tangible and Measurable Achievements in the Past Three Years |
---|
Poverty | A few small achievements |
---|
Crime | Do not work in this sphere |
---|
Trust among different sections of the community | Do not work in this sphere |
---|
Equitable distribution of resources and services | A few small achievements |
---|
Social position of marginalized groups | A few small achievements |
---|
Responsiveness of authorities | Do not work in this sphere |
---|
Appropriateness of public policies | Do not work in this sphere |
---|
Value of community assets | A few small achievements |
---|
Quality of the environment | A few small achievements |
---|
Number of people and organizations working to change and improve their community | Much achievement |
---|
Levels of innovation and risk taking in addressing community problems | Much achievement |
---|
Networks and links between different parts of the community | Some important achievements |
---|
Gender equity | Do not work in this sphere |
---|
Charitable giving through the community foundation | Much achievement |
---|
Number of people and organizations involved in philanthropic giving | Much achievement |
---|
|
Active Partnerships |
---|
Formal community associations and groups | Lot |
---|
Informal associations of citizens | Lot |
---|
Non-governmental organizations | Lot |
---|
Local government | Lot |
---|
National government | Not at all |
---|
Universities | Little |
---|
Schools | Lot |
---|
Businesses | Lot |
---|
|
Other Institutions Helpful to Our Work |
---|
National association of grantmakers | Helpful |
---|
Regional association of grantmakers | Neither helpful or unhelpful |
---|
Global Fund for Community Foundations | Neither helpful or unhelpful |
---|
Particular foundation | Helpful |
---|
Other organization | Helpful |
---|
|
Involvement of Local People |
---|
Regularly survey local people about our programs | Yes |
---|
Local people are engaged in the delivery of our work | Yes |
---|
Local people control what our organization does | Yes |
---|
Have local people represented on our board | Yes |
---|
Have regular sessions where local people advise us what our programs should do | Yes |
---|
Actively engage local people as volunteers | Yes |
---|
All of our board is composed of local people | Yes |
---|
Account to local people about our successes and failures each year | Yes |
---|
|
Assistance in Overcoming Main Difficulties Faced in Developing Organization Further |
---|
Increased funding | Very important |
---|
Better legal or fiscal environment | Important |
---|
More volunteers | Important |
---|
Access to advice or technical assistance | Important |
---|
Better local culture of giving | Important |
---|
Stronger civil society | Important |
---|
More responsive authorities | Neither important nor unimportant |
---|
|
Other | Did not answer |
---|
Most Meaningful Change that Organization Has Helped to Bring About in the Last Three Years | We have increased the awareness of how nonprofit organizations enhance our lives every day and have encouraged more citizens to support them. |
---|