Fundación Comunitaria Puebla IBP
13 Poniente 2324-102
Puebla, Puebla 72160
Mexico
Mission
To promote citizen engagement through guaranteed transparency in the procurement and professional distribution of philanthropic funding, resulting in the sustainable development of our community
Most Meaningful Change
Our foundation provides a space for our citizens to develop action programs in response to social problems they observe in our state. We currently house 70 citizen initiatives and provide guidance regarding their development and administration.
2000 Year Founded
5 Paid Staff (Full-Time Equivalent)
Organization | Fundación Comunitaria Puebla IBP |
---|
Address 1 | 13 Poniente 2324-102 |
---|
Address 2 | Did not answer |
---|
City / Town | Puebla |
---|
State / Region | Puebla |
---|
ZIP / Postal Code | 72160 |
---|
Country | Mexico |
---|
Continent | North America |
---|
Map Address (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Map City / Town (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Map State / Region (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Map Zip / Postal Code (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Map Country (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Phone | 52 222 231 2846 |
---|
Email | direccionfcp@gmail.com |
---|
Website | www.fcp.org.mx |
---|
Organization Leader (Name, Title) | Ms. Monika Schivy, Executive Director |
---|
Primary Contact’s Name | Deborah Acevedo |
---|
Primary Contact’s Position | Board member |
---|
Year Founded | 2000 |
---|
Mission Statement | To promote citizen engagement through guaranteed transparency in the procurement and professional distribution of philanthropic funding, resulting in the sustainable development of our community |
---|
Organization Description | Community Foundation |
---|
Other Description | Did not answer |
---|
Approximate Size of the Population Serviced | 6,000,000 |
---|
Total Paid Staff (Full-Time Equivalents) | 5 |
---|
Total Unpaid Staff (Full-Time Equivalents) | Did not answer |
---|
Total Board Members | 9 |
---|
Organization’s Total Income in Last Fiscal Year | Did not answer |
---|
Organization’s Gifts Income in Last Fiscal Year | Did not answer |
---|
Organization’s Total Expenditures in Last Fiscal Year | Did not answer |
---|
Organization’s Grantmaking Budget in Last Fiscal Year | Did not answer |
---|
Does Organization Have an Endowment | No but intend to build one |
---|
Value of Endowment (or Financial Reserves) as of the End of Last Fiscal Year | Did not answer |
---|
Change in Financial Status Over Last Three Years | A little improvement |
---|
Factors that Played a Role in the Origins of Your Organization |
---|
Community leadership | Played a centrally important role |
---|
Philanthropic gifts | Played an important role |
---|
Grassroots activism | Played a centrally important role |
---|
Inadequate government services | Played an important role |
---|
Changes in the political environment | Played an important role |
---|
Changes in the economic environment | No role |
---|
Government initiative funding | Played an important role |
---|
Foundation initiative funding | Played an important role |
---|
Bilateral or multilateral initiative funding | Played an important role |
---|
Favorable legal or fiscal policies | No role |
---|
|
Time Spent Working in Following Areas |
---|
Neighborhood | Very little time |
---|
Locally | Fair amount of time |
---|
Regionally | Fair amount of time |
---|
Nationally | None |
---|
Internationally | None |
---|
|
Rate Importance of the Following Functions |
---|
Grantmaking | Important but not central |
---|
Having local people as leaders in the organization | Centrally important |
---|
Seeking local donations | Centrally important |
---|
Having a gender balance in the organization | Centrally important |
---|
Board reflective of community diversity | Centrally important |
---|
Building an endowment | Important but not central |
---|
Serving donor needs | Centrally important |
---|
Acting as a fiscal intermediary for the community | Centrally important |
---|
Building inclusion and trust in the community | Important but not central |
---|
Pursuing equity | Important but not central |
---|
Accountability to local people | Centrally important |
---|
Raising money for grantmaking annually | Important but not central |
---|
Community development | Centrally important |
---|
|
In the Last Year, Extent to Which Programming and/or Grantmaking Involved Work in the Following Areas |
---|
Arts and culture | Fair amount |
---|
Education | Lot |
---|
Environment | Fair amount |
---|
Health | Lot |
---|
Human and social services | Fair amount |
---|
Human rights | Little |
---|
International relations | Not at all |
---|
Religion | Not at all |
---|
Economic development | Fair amount |
---|
Conflict resolution/bridging different parts of the community | Not at all |
---|
Information technology | Not at all |
---|
Strengthening local or regional government | Little |
---|
Housing | Not at all |
---|
Children | Lot |
---|
Water | Not at all |
---|
Alternative energy | Not at all |
---|
Disaster relief | Not at all |
---|
Advocacy with authorities | Not at all |
---|
Job training | Little |
---|
|
Nongrantmaking Services Offered to Community in Recent Years |
---|
Convening for issues of local concern | Occasionally |
---|
Promote collaboration between grantees | Occasionally |
---|
Promote understanding of public policy | Occasionally |
---|
Training/capacity-building for local organizations | Occasionally |
---|
Advocacy | Did not answer |
---|
Loaned staff | Did not answer |
---|
Research | Did not answer |
---|
Community needs assessment | Did not answer |
---|
Leadership development | Occasionally |
---|
Internships | Occasionally |
---|
Providing space for local organizations | Often |
---|
Access to information technology | Did not answer |
---|
Publishing/knowledge sharing | Did not answer |
---|
|
Main Trends Over the Past Year in Geographic Area Served |
---|
Poverty | Getting better |
---|
Crime | Getting worse |
---|
Trust among different sections of the community | No change |
---|
Equitable distribution of resources and services | No change |
---|
Social position of marginalized groups | Getting better |
---|
Responsiveness of authorities | Getting better |
---|
Appropriateness of public policies | No change |
---|
Value of community assets | Getting better |
---|
Quality of the environment | No change |
---|
Number of people and organizations working to change and improve their community | Getting better |
---|
Levels of innovation and risk taking in addressing community problems | No change |
---|
Networks and links between different parts of the community | No change |
---|
Gender equity | No change |
---|
Charitable giving through the community foundation | Getting better |
---|
Number of people and organizations involved in philanthropic giving | Getting better |
---|
|
Extent to Which Organization Can Claim Tangible and Measurable Achievements in the Past Three Years |
---|
Poverty | Some important achievements |
---|
Crime | Do not work in this sphere |
---|
Trust among different sections of the community | Work in the sphere but no measurable achievement |
---|
Equitable distribution of resources and services | Work in the sphere but no measurable achievement |
---|
Social position of marginalized groups | A few small achievements |
---|
Responsiveness of authorities | A few small achievements |
---|
Appropriateness of public policies | Work in the sphere but no measurable achievement |
---|
Value of community assets | A few small achievements |
---|
Quality of the environment | A few small achievements |
---|
Number of people and organizations working to change and improve their community | A few small achievements |
---|
Levels of innovation and risk taking in addressing community problems | A few small achievements |
---|
Networks and links between different parts of the community | Some important achievements |
---|
Gender equity | A few small achievements |
---|
Charitable giving through the community foundation | A few small achievements |
---|
Number of people and organizations involved in philanthropic giving | Some important achievements |
---|
|
Active Partnerships |
---|
Formal community associations and groups | Lot |
---|
Informal associations of citizens | Lot |
---|
Non-governmental organizations | Lot |
---|
Local government | Little |
---|
National government | Little |
---|
Universities | Lot |
---|
Schools | Little |
---|
Businesses | Lot |
---|
|
Other Institutions Helpful to Our Work |
---|
National association of grantmakers | N/A |
---|
Regional association of grantmakers | N/A |
---|
Global Fund for Community Foundations | Neither helpful or unhelpful |
---|
Particular foundation | Neither helpful or unhelpful |
---|
Other organization | N/A |
---|
|
Involvement of Local People |
---|
Regularly survey local people about our programs | Yes |
---|
Local people are engaged in the delivery of our work | Yes |
---|
Local people control what our organization does | Yes |
---|
Have local people represented on our board | Yes |
---|
Have regular sessions where local people advise us what our programs should do | Yes |
---|
Actively engage local people as volunteers | Yes |
---|
All of our board is composed of local people | Yes |
---|
Account to local people about our successes and failures each year | Yes |
---|
|
Assistance in Overcoming Main Difficulties Faced in Developing Organization Further |
---|
Increased funding | Important |
---|
Better legal or fiscal environment | Important |
---|
More volunteers | Important |
---|
Access to advice or technical assistance | Important |
---|
Better local culture of giving | Very important |
---|
Stronger civil society | Very important |
---|
More responsive authorities | Very important |
---|
|
Other | Did not answer |
---|
Most Meaningful Change that Organization Has Helped to Bring About in the Last Three Years | Our foundation provides a space for our citizens to develop action programs in response to social problems they observe in our state. We currently house 70 citizen initiatives and provide guidance regarding their development and administration. |
---|