Red Deer and District Community Foundation
4805-48 Street, Suite 203
Red Deer, Alberta T4N 1S6
Canada
Mission
To be a community catalyst committed to growing a legacy which strengthens the quality of life in Red Deer and the surrounding area
Most Meaningful Change
Over the past five years the foundation has taken the lead in the implementation of our city’s Plan Towards Ending Homelessness.
1989 Year Founded
3 Paid Staff (Full-Time Equivalent)
$11,468,332 Endowment Value
$873,009 Total Annual Grantmaking
Organization | Red Deer and District Community Foundation |
---|
Address 1 | 4805-48 Street, Suite 203 |
---|
Address 2 | Did not answer |
---|
City / Town | Red Deer |
---|
State / Region | Alberta |
---|
ZIP / Postal Code | T4N 1S6 |
---|
Country | Canada |
---|
Continent | North America |
---|
Map Address (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Map City / Town (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Map State / Region (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Map Zip / Postal Code (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Map Country (If Different) | Did not answer |
---|
Phone | (403) 341-6911 |
---|
Email | kristinebugayong@rddcf.ca |
---|
Website | www.rddcf.ca |
---|
Organization Leader (Name, Title) | Kristine Bugayong, CEO |
---|
Primary Contact’s Name | Kristine Bugayong |
---|
Primary Contact’s Position | Chief Executive Officer |
---|
Year Founded | 1989 |
---|
Mission Statement | To be a community catalyst committed to growing a legacy which strengthens the quality of life in Red Deer and the surrounding area |
---|
Organization Description | Community Foundation |
---|
Other Description | Did not answer |
---|
Approximate Size of the Population Serviced | 350,000 |
---|
Total Paid Staff (Full-Time Equivalents) | 3 |
---|
Total Unpaid Staff (Full-Time Equivalents) | Did not answer |
---|
Total Board Members | 8 |
---|
Organization’s Total Income in Last Fiscal Year | $330,864 |
---|
Organization’s Gifts Income in Last Fiscal Year | Did not answer |
---|
Organization’s Total Expenditures in Last Fiscal Year | $350,306 |
---|
Organization’s Grantmaking Budget in Last Fiscal Year | $873,009 |
---|
Does Organization Have an Endowment | Yes |
---|
Value of Endowment (or Financial Reserves) as of the End of Last Fiscal Year | $11,468,332 |
---|
Change in Financial Status Over Last Three Years | Stayed about the same |
---|
Factors that Played a Role in the Origins of Your Organization |
---|
Community leadership | Played a centrally important role |
---|
Philanthropic gifts | Played a centrally important role |
---|
Grassroots activism | No role |
---|
Inadequate government services | Played a slight role |
---|
Changes in the political environment | No role |
---|
Changes in the economic environment | Played a slight role |
---|
Government initiative funding | Played a slight role |
---|
Foundation initiative funding | Played a centrally important role |
---|
Bilateral or multilateral initiative funding | Played an important role |
---|
Favorable legal or fiscal policies | Played a slight role |
---|
|
Time Spent Working in Following Areas |
---|
Neighborhood | Fair amount of time |
---|
Locally | Lots of time |
---|
Regionally | Fair amount of time |
---|
Nationally | Fair amount of time |
---|
Internationally | Very little time |
---|
|
Rate Importance of the Following Functions |
---|
Grantmaking | Centrally important |
---|
Having local people as leaders in the organization | Centrally important |
---|
Seeking local donations | Centrally important |
---|
Having a gender balance in the organization | Important but not central |
---|
Board reflective of community diversity | Centrally important |
---|
Building an endowment | Centrally important |
---|
Serving donor needs | Centrally important |
---|
Acting as a fiscal intermediary for the community | Important but not central |
---|
Building inclusion and trust in the community | Centrally important |
---|
Pursuing equity | Important but not central |
---|
Accountability to local people | Important but not central |
---|
Raising money for grantmaking annually | Important but not central |
---|
Community development | Centrally important |
---|
|
In the Last Year, Extent to Which Programming and/or Grantmaking Involved Work in the Following Areas |
---|
Arts and culture | Fair amount |
---|
Education | Fair amount |
---|
Environment | Fair amount |
---|
Health | Fair amount |
---|
Human and social services | Fair amount |
---|
Human rights | Little |
---|
International relations | Not at all |
---|
Religion | Not at all |
---|
Economic development | Little |
---|
Conflict resolution/bridging different parts of the community | Little |
---|
Information technology | Little |
---|
Strengthening local or regional government | Not at all |
---|
Housing | Little |
---|
Children | Fair amount |
---|
Water | Little |
---|
Alternative energy | Little |
---|
Disaster relief | Not at all |
---|
Advocacy with authorities | Not at all |
---|
Job training | Not at all |
---|
|
Nongrantmaking Services Offered to Community in Recent Years |
---|
Convening for issues of local concern | Often |
---|
Promote collaboration between grantees | Often |
---|
Promote understanding of public policy | Occasionally |
---|
Training/capacity-building for local organizations | Often |
---|
Advocacy | Rarely |
---|
Loaned staff | Never |
---|
Research | Often |
---|
Community needs assessment | Often |
---|
Leadership development | Often |
---|
Internships | Rarely |
---|
Providing space for local organizations | Occasionally |
---|
Access to information technology | Rarely |
---|
Publishing/knowledge sharing | Occasionally |
---|
|
Main Trends Over the Past Year in Geographic Area Served |
---|
Poverty | No change |
---|
Crime | No change |
---|
Trust among different sections of the community | Getting better |
---|
Equitable distribution of resources and services | Getting better |
---|
Social position of marginalized groups | Did not answer |
---|
Responsiveness of authorities | Getting better |
---|
Appropriateness of public policies | Getting better |
---|
Value of community assets | Getting better |
---|
Quality of the environment | Getting better |
---|
Number of people and organizations working to change and improve their community | Getting better |
---|
Levels of innovation and risk taking in addressing community problems | Getting better |
---|
Networks and links between different parts of the community | Getting better |
---|
Gender equity | Getting better |
---|
Charitable giving through the community foundation | Getting better |
---|
Number of people and organizations involved in philanthropic giving | Getting better |
---|
|
Extent to Which Organization Can Claim Tangible and Measurable Achievements in the Past Three Years |
---|
Poverty | Some important achievements |
---|
Crime | Some important achievements |
---|
Trust among different sections of the community | Some important achievements |
---|
Equitable distribution of resources and services | Some important achievements |
---|
Social position of marginalized groups | Some important achievements |
---|
Responsiveness of authorities | Much achievement |
---|
Appropriateness of public policies | Some important achievements |
---|
Value of community assets | Some important achievements |
---|
Quality of the environment | Some important achievements |
---|
Number of people and organizations working to change and improve their community | Some important achievements |
---|
Levels of innovation and risk taking in addressing community problems | Some important achievements |
---|
Networks and links between different parts of the community | Some important achievements |
---|
Gender equity | Some important achievements |
---|
Charitable giving through the community foundation | Much achievement |
---|
Number of people and organizations involved in philanthropic giving | Much achievement |
---|
|
Active Partnerships |
---|
Formal community associations and groups | Little |
---|
Informal associations of citizens | Not at all |
---|
Non-governmental organizations | Little |
---|
Local government | Little |
---|
National government | Not at all |
---|
Universities | Not at all |
---|
Schools | Little |
---|
Businesses | Not at all |
---|
|
Other Institutions Helpful to Our Work |
---|
National association of grantmakers | Very helpful |
---|
Regional association of grantmakers | N/A |
---|
Global Fund for Community Foundations | N/A |
---|
Particular foundation | N/A |
---|
Other organization | N/A |
---|
|
Involvement of Local People |
---|
Regularly survey local people about our programs | Yes |
---|
Local people are engaged in the delivery of our work | Yes |
---|
Local people control what our organization does | Yes |
---|
Have local people represented on our board | Yes |
---|
Have regular sessions where local people advise us what our programs should do | Yes |
---|
Actively engage local people as volunteers | Yes |
---|
All of our board is composed of local people | Yes |
---|
Account to local people about our successes and failures each year | Yes |
---|
|
Assistance in Overcoming Main Difficulties Faced in Developing Organization Further |
---|
Increased funding | Important |
---|
Better legal or fiscal environment | Neither important nor unimportant |
---|
More volunteers | Important |
---|
Access to advice or technical assistance | Important |
---|
Better local culture of giving | Important |
---|
Stronger civil society | Important |
---|
More responsive authorities | Important |
---|
|
Other | Did not answer |
---|
Most Meaningful Change that Organization Has Helped to Bring About in the Last Three Years | Over the past five years the foundation has taken the lead in the implementation of our city’s Plan Towards Ending Homelessness. |
---|